THE TALMUD AND BIBLE BELIEVERS
By: Elizabeth Dilling
The Sadducees were the first of these enemies. They
were the constant opponents of the Pharisees and their imported Babylonian
paganism, misrepresented by the Pharisees as the Tradition of the Elders, the
"Oral Law" ostensibly transmitted privately to Moses and on down,
superseding anything written in the Bible.
In the six years of civil war between the Pharisees and
Alexander Jannaeus, King and High Priest of Jerusalem, 50,000 were killed on
both sides before this Sadducean ruler succumbed, and his widow Salome turned
affairs over to the Pharisees in 79 B.C. Her brother, Simon ben Shetah, had
been waiting for such an opportunity. The continued civil war resulted in the
sons of Alexander Jannaeus, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, in 63 B.C., going hat in
hand to Pompey, Caesar's Roman General in Syria, asking him to invade Palestine
and slaughter their respective opponents. This is how Rome happened to be in
power when Christ was born. Only after Christ's Ascension did the Pharisees
triumph.
Other enemies have been the Samaritans, whom Our Lord
seemed to favor. They had been brought in from Cutha and other far places in
the World Assyrian Empire, to take the place of the ten Israel tribes deported
in 721 B.C. They had adopted Biblical Judaism and opposed the return from
Babylon in 536 B.C. of the Pharisee-run population.
Each year a handful of Samaritans celebrate Passover on the
site of their former temple at Mt. Gerizim, an event contemptuously referred to
by American Jewish writers.
The Karaites arose in the 8th century in Babylonia
under Anan to plague the Pharisee top element by scorning the Talmud and
holding up the Bible as supreme authority. A molten stream of hatred,
therefore, was turned on them. With true Talmudic "Brotherhood" and
"tolerance," Anan was expelled from Babylonia, and founded the
Karaite sect in Jerusalem. Later, when the few remaining thousands of Karaites
were favored by the Czar of Russia, although classed as
"untouchables" by Talmudists, the latter offered to join the Karaites
to get immunity from Czarist displeasure — but the Karaites turned them down as
hypocrites.
The supreme curses the Karaites have shared with Christians are
due to the adherence of the Karaites to the Bible, instead of the
"sages," or Jewish Talmud. They are likened to the Sadducees and
Samaritans in this. (See Exhibit 16, Exhibit 24, Exhibit 25, and Exhibit 26).
The ultimate object of hatred in Talmudic Judaism is Christ,
and the targets of Talmudic hatred are not just Gentile non-Jews, "the
people who are like an ass — slaves who are considered the property of the
master" (Talmud, Kethuboth
111a). Of these non-Jews, the Christians are most insanely hated and
loathed because their doctrines are the opposite of every Talmudic doctrine.
They rank not just as animals, like the rest of non-Talmudic humanity, but
almost as vermin, to be eradicated. Language in the Talmud is virtually
exhausted to find foul and hated names for Christians.
Min (plural Minim) is used throughout the Talmud as a term
to designate Christians. In the "Shemoneh Esreh," or 18 Benedictions,
the word has been changed from time to time as wary non-Jews become aware of
its meaning. Note at the left column of Exhibit 284 that
"Zaddukim" was substituted, and "Apikoresim."
In the right column of Exhibit 284 we see
"Epicureans" substituted by Maimonides (a Talmudic pillar). Reference
is made to uncensored Talmud editions of Berechoth 28b
(left column, same Exhibit), Sanhedrin 27a,
Horayoth 11a,
and Gittin 45a.
The Berechoth statement reads: "The benediction relating to the minim was
instituted in Jabneh [Palestine] after the rest." The harangue goes on to
decree vengeance against anyone leaving out the benediction against the minim,
"because we suspect him of being min."
"The censored [ie. editions] have mumuar," says
this exhibit from the Jewish Encyclopedia, instead of minim. And, in Sanhedrin 27a,
mumar is used to denounce as wholly disqualified one who eats meat which is not
slaughtered in kosher manner, thus showing "his contempt for the law"
(of the Talmud).
The Talmud Gittin 45b
reference states that "a scroll of the Law which has been written by a min
should be burnt." Distilled hate is the theme. [See Sabbath 116a]
The Horayoth
11a citation from the Talmud
(page 79 of the Soncino edition, not reproduced here), is another tirade
against those who rank below "common people" — the minim. It cites
those who drink wine dedicated to an idol, referring to Holy Communion. Christ
is always the "idol" denounced by the Talmud, while real idolatry in
regard to spirits, planets, child burning to Molech, Baal filth, are permitted
in Judaism.
[page
13] Present day Jews keep up a
continual propaganda that burning anti-Christian, immoral or subversive books
is the depth of bigotry, bias and intolerance. But the teaching in Sabbath 111a
[correction: Sabbath 116a]
of the Talmud is even cited in the Jewish Encyclopedia (under Gentiles), which
holds that Christian books should be burned "without regard to the name of
God appearing therein." (See Exhibit 273, right hand
column.)
Characteristic of charging as a crime against others what
Talmudists themselves are doing, a Sanhedrin passage denounces Christ as a
sorcerer (Talmud, Exhibit 76). It was to
refute this Talmudic teaching of hate against Christ, that Martin Luther wrote
his "Shemhamphoras" on the charge that Christ did His miracles by
sorcery, using the Tetragrammaton, which, in some Talmud passages, He is said
to have stolen and hidden in His flesh!
Christ was amazingly correct in designating the Talmudic
Pharisees as children of the Father of Lies. (John 8:44)
Christianity is likened in the Talmud to one of two
daughters of a horse-leech calling from hell, "Bring, bring!" One is
the government — "Which constantly imposes fresh taxes and duties"
and the other "Minuth" (Christianity) — "Which continually lures
the unwary to its erroneous teaching" — a Biblical verse is then misused
as a curse "applied to those converted to idolatry" (Christianity).
Then another says the voice of hell is calling to bring these two
"daughters," "who cry and call in this world," back to
hell. (See Exhibit 179)
The Talmud speaks of a woman who confessed that her younger
son was the offspring of her older son and that incest was her lightest sin,
and wanted to die in peace but could not, for if incest was her lightest sin
"it may be assumed that she had also adopted minuth [Christianity] …
that is why she did not die … . Since she said of her guilt that it is
one of the lightest, it may be assumed that she was guilty of idolatry
[Christianity] also."
A tale follows about a Rabbi who visited every harlot in the
world, crossing seven rivers to get at the last one. He is allowed to die in
peace because he had not committed the unforgivable minuth (Christianity).
(Talmud, Abodah Zarah l7a, Exhibit 180)
The Talmud says that Rabbi Ishmael (sage) has a nephew who
is bitten by a snake and wants to let Jacob, a Disciple of Jesus, heal him, but
dies in the middle of the sentence. The Rabbi thereupon exclaims: "Happy
art thou Ben Dama for thou wert pure in body and thy soul likewise left thee in
purity … ." His joy was because, of course, it was preferable to
die of snakebite than to be healed by a Christian. (Talmud, Abodah Zarah 27b,
see Exhibit 187)
The Talmud tale is told that, because of talking to a
Christian Disciple of Jesus, a Rabbi is suspected of being pro-Christian, which
makes him deeply ashamed. He tells the lie that Jesus taught that the hire of a
harlot may be used to build a privy for the high priest. (Abodah Zarah 16b-17a)
This last pleased the rabbi very much, he says. (Exhibit 178)
This filthy and false story to defame Christ is used in a
typical Pharisee lie by Rabbi Louis Finklestein in his publication "The
Pharisees" (See pages xv-xvi of the Foreword. Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, and Exhibit 3
herein are from same publication.) Any epithets directed at Pharisaism by
Christians in the early centuries Finklestein ascribes to conflict between
Christians and "their former comrades, who continued loyal to unaltered
Pharisaism. Nevertheless, the Pharisee and the Christian remained sufficiently
close to regard one another with respect." Then the above Rabbi Eliezer
lie is used as a compliment!: "Rabbi Eliezer ben Hyrcanus, one of the most
orthodox of the sages, offered high praise to an interpretation of Scripture
given by an early Christian" (Aboda Zara
l7a). This is the self-same libel on Christ!
At the time the Jewish Encyclopedia was published in 1905
there was no English translation of the Talmud with identifying folio numbers.
The first, by Rodkinson in 1903, was not only abridged, but also without folio
numbers. Only with the relatively recent Soncino English translation of the
Talmud do we have folio numbers and overt, unmistakable references which
require no argument or interpretation for non-Jews. However, in 1905, lies
concerning the Talmud were quite safe from prying non-Jewish eyes.
The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia states: "During the first
century of Christianity the Rabbis lived on friendly terms with the minim"
(Christians).
Anyone familiar with the liquid fire turned on Pharisaism by
Christ in the New Testament is not fooled by this. However, to buttress this
lie, the above false privy tale attributed to Jesus is told as though it
indicated friendliness — Abodah Zarah
16b-17a. Concerning the above anti-Christian "snakebite"
story from the Talmud, the Encyclopedia then states (Exhibit 267 herein):
"Ben Dama, a nephew of
Rabbi Ishmael, having been bitten by a snake, allowed himself to be cured by
means of an exorcism uttered by the min Jacob, a Judaeo-Christian."
Does not this one series of circumstances once again
illustrate how amazingly correct Christ was in designating the Pharisees as
children of the Father of Lies (John 8:44)?
Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin), who made the first English
translation of the Babylonian Talmud, asks, in the section on the History of
the Talmud: [page 14]
Is
the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence
in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? … To such inquiries the
learned class of Jewish rabbis answer by holding up the Talmud … .
The Talmud then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was
called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions.
(See Exhibit 27)
She is called "Miriam, a dresser of women's hair."
She "committed adultery." (Exhibit 75)
"She played the harlot with carpenters." (Exhibit 114)
All rabbinical sources ascribe to Jesus, "illegitimate
birth ... the seducer was a soldier by the name of Panthera [also called
Pandira. and Stada]." "Pappus [husband of Mary] has nothing to do
with the story of Jesus, and was only connected with it because his wife
happened to be called "Miriam" [Maryl and was known to be an
adulteress."
All the Life of Jesus (Toledot Yeshu) "editions contain
a similar story of a dispute which Jesus carried on with the scribes who on the
ground of that dispute declared him to be a bastard." (Jewish
Encyclopedia, "Jesus," Exhibit 277)
Under the name of "Balaam" the most lewd Talmud
passages concerning Jesus appear. Proof that Jesus is called "Balaam"
is found in the Jewish Encyclopedia (under "Balaam") which, after
enumerating His alleged loathsome qualities, states: "Hence … the
pseudonym 'Balaam' given to Jesus in Sanhedrin
106b and Gittin 57a."
(See Exhibit 111,
Exhibit 112,
Exhibit 113,
Exhibit 114,
Exhibit 115,
Exhibit 274,
Exhibit 275,
Exhibit 278,
and Exhibit 279)
In the same article, we are told that the Talmud likens the
Gospel Christians and Christ to Baal sex-worshippers because of whose
abominations 24,000 Israelites died of plague at the time of Balaam. (Numbers
25:1-9)
Because Balaam had been asked to curse the Israelites but
instead did not and foretold the coming Messiah (Numbers 24:17),
the flimsy pretext is made that Jesus was a curse like Balaam. "He is
pictured as blind of one eye and lame in one foot and his disciples
distinguished by three morally corrupt qualities …" He is called
"one that ruined a people," and His churches are likened to nudist
Baal worship.
And, "this hostility against his memory finds its
climax in the dictum that whenever one discovers a feature of wickedness or
disgrace in his life, one should preach about it." (Sanhedrin
106b)
Turning to Exhibit 114, which is
Sanhedrin 106a-l06b of the Talmud, mentioned above, we see the likening of
Jesus to the supposed act of Balaam in causing 24,000 Israelites to go whoring
and die of plague (some 1450 years before Christ was born). He is due for his
"reward" for this infamy. His mother, Mary, is "She who …
played the harlot with carpenters … They subjected him to four deaths,
stoning, burning, decapitation and strangulation … he was thirty-three or
thirty-four years old." Another says: "I … have seen Balaam's
Chronicle in which it stated, 'Balaam the lame was thirty years old when
Phinehas the Robber killed him.'"
The footnote explains:
"Balaam is frequently
used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus." The mother of Jesus is
identified, the four deaths enumerated, "and … all the Balaam
passages are anti-Christian in tendency, Balaam being used as an alias for
Jesus, Phinehas the Robber is thus taken to represent Pontius Pilate, and the
Chronicle of Balaam probably to denote a Gospel."
Verifying the Jewish Encyclopedia account above on Balaam
being Jesus in the Talmud we see: "in the case of the wicked Balaam:
whatever you find written about him, lecture upon it to his disadvantage."
(Exhibit 115)
Christian churches are likened to tents for Baal prostitution, with old women
outside, young ones inside to get customers drunk and disrobe and worship the
"idol," Jesus, in Baal manner, by prostitution. (Exhibit 112)
Hanging a calumny on the brief mention in the Bible that
Balaam was slain (Numbers 32:8),
the above passage in Sanhedrin is cited by the Jewish Encyclopedia thus:
"In the process of killing Balaam [Num. xxxi.8],
all four legal methods of execution — stoning, burning, decapitating, and
strangling — were employed" [Sanh. 1.c]. (See Exhibit 274) "He met
his death at the age of thirty-three (Ibid) and it is stated that he had
no portion in the world to come" (Sanh. x. 2; 90a).
Sanhedrin 90a of the Talmud, denying "Balaam" a
place in the world to come, begins with Exhibit 96 herein. There
it is stated that the resurrection being denied by Sadducees and Samaritans,
"It was to oppose these that the doctrine was emphatically asserted in the
second of the Eighteen Benedictions." The "sin" of pronouncing
the Tetragrammaton is cited against Christ and Christians. (Exhibit 97)
The curse of Christians, as those who pronounce the
"Name" as "spelt" (Tetragrammaton) and read
"uncanonical books," begins with a Mishnah (starting with Exhibit 97).
Vague meanderings to throw off a possible Christian reader appear in the
footnotes (Exhibit 97) with a hint
that the "uncanonical books" may mean this or that, but: "There
are indications, however, that something more is meant."
But the footnote to "uncanonical books," still
being discussed 68 pages later (See Exhibit 102) overtly
reveals that the reference is to the New Testament, and that the word
"Sadducees" is used to indicate "Gentiles."
The "religious" Orthodox Jew recites the
"Eighteen Benedictions," or "Shemoneh Esreh," three times
week days, four times on holidays and Sabbaths, the 7th and 12th of which curse
the Christians and non-Jews to hell and perdition. Thus, the "good
Orthodox Jew" gives us Christians 6 cursings on ordinary days, 8 on
"specials." Note all the varieties of double talk which have been
utilized down the centuries to keep the truth about the "Shemoneh
Esreh" from the non-Jews, who might not be friendly to those who recite
this "Brotherhood" litany religiously 6 to 8 times daily! Note:
"In order to obviate hostile misconstructions, the text was
modified …," and one change after another [page 15]
to fool the non-Jew is enumerated. (See Exhibit 284)
The 12th benediction, the "Birkat ha-Minim" (curse
against Christians, etc.) "furnished the traducers of Judaism and the Jews
a ready weapon of attack." (See Exhibit 284) This
"Petition Against Enemies" (non-Jews) is called an "imprecatory
appeal." "Imprecatory" means, of course, "invoking evil, a
curse" (Webster). It is further stated by the cautious Jewish Encyclopedia
(same Exhibit),
"The seventh benediction … looks like a duplication and is
superfluous."
The Jewish Encyclopedia also cites a recommendation by the
"sages" for daily recitation of the "benediction:"
"Blessed be thou who hast not made me a goy." (See Exhibit 273)
In the Talmud, the Christian is also planted in Hell for
eternity under a deluge of "boiling excrement" if opposing
"Judaism:"
"Whoever mocks the words
of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement." (Talmud, Gittin 57a;
Exhibit 202)
On this same page, where the ordinary Christian gets this
eternal fate, Christ is similarly punished forever in hell with "boiling
semen."
Jesus, as stated in both the Talmud and Jewish Encyclopedia,
gets "four legal methods of execution" and is Crucified as well, as a
blasphemer of Pharisee Judaism.
Jesus stoned, then "hanged" or crucified,
Sanhedrin 43a-45b (Exhibit 46 and Exhibit 48);
Sanhedrin 67a (Exhibit 75), where under
another phony name (Ben Stada) Jesus is identified as "Jesus of
Nazareth." See Jewish Encyclopedia, Exhibit 277 and Exhibit 8.
As to Judas, we are told (Exhibit 279) that:
"when Judas found he could not touch Jesus in any way, in aerial battle,
he defiled him" (the "privy concept," once again, which runs
through the Talmud).
Jesus' apostles all killed, Sanhedrin 43a, b (Exhibit 47). Their names
are decoded by Jewish Encyclopedia (see Exhibit 278, right
column.)
Jesus crucified as a "blasphemer," Sanhedrin 46a (Exhibit 51),
Jewish Encyclopedia (Exhibit 276).
Jesus burned, Sanhedrin 52a (Exhibit 52); manner of
burning, Yebamoth 6b (Exhibit 151), verified by
Jewish Encyclopedia under "Balaam" (Exhibit 274). He is
"lowered into dung up to his armpits then a hard cloth was placed within a
soft one, wound round his neck and the two loose ends pulled in opposite
directions forcing him to open his mouth. A wick was then lit, and thrown into
his mouth so that it descended into his body and burnt his bowels … his
mouth was forced open with pinchers against his wishes (Exhibit 52) And: "The
death penalty of 'burning' was executed by pouring molten lead through the
condemned man's mouth into his body, burning his internal organs. (Exhibit 152)
Jesus strangled: "He was lowered into dung up to his
armpits then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck,
and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead."
(Talmud, Sanhedrin 52a, Exhibit 53)
This is repeated (Sanhedrin 106b; Exhibit 114) and verified
by the Jewish Encyclopedia (Exhibit 274).
Jesus in hell where His punishment is "boiling in hot
semen." (Talmud, Gittin 57a; Exhibit 202) The subject
is identified as Jesus in a footnote, also in the Jewish Encyclopedia under
"Balaam." (Exhibit 275)
Christians in hell (in the above passage) are punished by
"boiling hot excrement" which is the punishment for all who mock
"at the words of the sages" (i.e. the Talmud).
Jesus "committed bestiality," "corrupted the
people," is "turned into hell." (Talmud Sanhedrin 105a; Exhibit 106
and Exhibit 107)
Jesus "limped on one foot" and "was blind in
one eye," "he practiced enchantment by means of his membrum,"
"he committed bestiality with his ass," he was a fool who "did
not even know his beast's mind." (Talmud, Sanhedrin l05a-105b; Exhibit 108
and 109)
The ridiculous and foul misuse of Judges 5:27 about
Sisera's dying convulsions meaning sexual intercourse is here applied to Jesus,
with a footnote "explanation" of Judges 5:27:
"This is taken to mean sexual intercourse …"
Jesus attempts to seduce women, is excommunicated by a rabbi
and then worships a brick, was a seducer of Israel, and practiced magic.
(Talmud, Sanhedrin l07b; Exhibit 117), also the
Jewish Encyclopedia (See Exhibit 277).
Jesus is cited in the index of the Sanhedrin portion of
Talmud, "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud" (See Exhibit 43),
which shows the page numbers where He is denounced. (Exhibit 118)
Jesus' resurrection is cursed: "Woe unto him who maketh
himself alive by the name of God." (Talmud, Sanhedrin 106a; Exhibit 111)
The trial of Jesus: "It was by the action of the
priests that Jesus was sent before Pontius Pilate." The Sanhedrin priests
"had most reason to be offended with Jesus' action in cleansing the
Temple," the probable place of His trial, according to the Talmud. His
cry: "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" … was in all
its implications itself a disproof of the exaggerated claims made for him. The
very form of his punishment would disprove these claims in Jewish eyes. No
Messiah that Jews could recognize could suffer such a death; for "He that
is hanged is accursed of God" (Deuteronomy
xxi. 23). This refers to an "evil son" and Talmudist Rashi
adds "an insult to God." The foregoing is from the Jewish
Encyclopedia under "Jesus." (See Exhibit 276)
Other foul charges against Jesus and His mother, His being a
"bastard," and the like, follow. (Exhibit 277 from the same
Encyclopedia)
Bibliography:
THE JEWISH RELIGION: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario
Nota: sólo los miembros de este blog pueden publicar comentarios.